We often think of goals as simple, straightforward targets to aim for - things like "increase sales by 15%" or "lose 10 pounds." But as the research highlighted in this academic paper shows, goals are actually much more nuanced and complex than we typically assume.
In the paper "An Integrated Model of Goal-Focused Coaching" by Anthony M. Grant (2012), the author dives deep into the robust psychological literature on goals. He makes the case that an overly simplistic understanding of goals, such as equating them merely with SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound), can actually hamper coaching effectiveness.
The reality is that there are over 20 different types of goals that can impact the coaching process in distinct ways. Grant outlines several key distinctions, including:
Time Framing: Distal (long-term) goals vs. proximal (short-term) goals, with the timing influencing perceptions of attainability.
Outcome vs. Learning Goals: Outcome goals focus solely on the end result while learning goals emphasise the journey of mastering skills and knowledge. Learning goals can improve performance for complex tasks.
Approach vs. Avoidance Goals: Approaching a desired state (e.g. work-life balance) vs. avoiding an undesired state (e.g. less stress). Approach goals tend to be more beneficial.
Performance vs. Learning Goals: Performance goals are about demonstrating competence while learning goals prioritise acquiring new abilities. Over-indexing on performance can impair growth.
The paper argues that by deeply understanding this nuanced "goal taxonomy," coaches can work more effectively with clients to set goals that engage their intrinsic motivation, facilitate actionable strategies, and ultimately lead to greater growth and well-being.
So the next time you think about setting a goal, remember - goals are more than just a simple end-point. The type of goal you set, and how you frame it, can meaningfully impact your ability to achieve that goal and thrive along the journey.
Human behaviour is incredibly complex, which means the goals that direct our behaviour are also rich with layers and distinctions. Mastering those distinctions may be the difference between achieving surface-level compliance and unlocking deep engagement.
I encourage you to read the full paper to appreciate the richness of the goal construct - it may just change how you approach your goals forever.
Comments